Available To Serve You Nationwide On All Federal Cases
The Department of Justice has announced a significant expansion of federal fraud enforcement, creating new considerations for individuals, executives, health care providers, government contractors, and businesses that may face federal investigation.
In an August 13, 2026 memorandum, the DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division announced its enforcement priorities and described an expanded, technology-driven approach to investigating and prosecuting fraud.
The Division's stated mission is to prosecute fraud in the United States “no matter its size or complexity.”
For anyone who receives a federal subpoena, target letter, search warrant, or contact from federal investigators, the announcement also reinforces the importance of consulting an experienced federal fraud defense attorney as early as possible.
The government is not simply adding prosecutors. DOJ says it is building an enforcement operation supported by data scientists, financial analysis, technology, asset-recovery resources, investigators, and coordinated enforcement throughout the country.
That could affect not only how federal fraud cases are prosecuted, but also how potential cases are identified in the first place.
What Is the DOJ National Fraud Enforcement Division?
The National Fraud Enforcement Division is a Department of Justice division dedicated to combating fraud.
According to the August 13 memorandum, DOJ is reallocating resources from other Department components to substantially increase the Division's size. The Department expects the Division to reach approximately 500 attorneys and staff by August 24, 2026, with additional rapid growth planned over the following two years.
DOJ describes the resulting organization as a sophisticated and data-driven white-collar enforcement operation.
Its prosecutors will be supported by:
The Division also intends to coordinate with U.S. Attorneys' Offices, federal law enforcement agencies, executive agencies, and state and local authorities.
For a federal fraud defense attorney, one particularly significant aspect of this announcement is DOJ's emphasis on using data and technology to identify suspected misconduct.
An unusual financial or billing pattern can attract government attention. But an unusual pattern does not necessarily establish criminal fraud.
That distinction may become critical in defending these cases.
DOJ's memorandum identifies five principal enforcement priorities:
Each presents different potential risks for individuals and businesses.
Government procurement fraud is expressly identified as a critical enforcement priority.
The memorandum identifies suspected schemes involving:
DOJ is also targeting fraud involving government benefit and grant programs, including programs related to student loans, child care, veterans' benefits, nutritional assistance, disaster relief, and small businesses.
What does this mean for government contractors?
Businesses contracting with the federal government should expect increased scrutiny of invoices, pricing, certifications, representations, contract performance, and compliance with program requirements.
But a contractual dispute, billing discrepancy, regulatory violation, or administrative mistake does not automatically constitute criminal fraud.
Criminal liability depends upon the applicable statute and the evidence the government can prove.
A federal fraud lawyer involved during the investigative stage can examine whether the government's theory improperly characterizes an error, regulatory issue, contractual disagreement, or legitimate business decision as intentional criminal conduct.
Health care fraud remains a major federal enforcement priority.
DOJ specifically states that the Division will use “cutting-edge data analysis” to identify potentially exploitative health care fraud schemes.
The memorandum identifies:
The Division also anticipates pursuing significant money laundering, tax, and other financial crimes associated with health care fraud.
Why data analytics matters in health care fraud cases
The government's increased reliance on data deserves particular attention.
Data analysis can identify providers whose billing, prescribing, referral, or reimbursement patterns differ from statistical norms.
But statistically unusual does not necessarily mean fraudulent.
Patient populations, medical specialties, geographic conditions, referral relationships, reimbursement structures, and legitimate differences in medical practice can potentially produce unusual data.
When a health care fraud investigation originates from statistical analysis, an effective defense may require examining not only the alleged transactions but also the assumptions underlying the government's interpretation of the data.
That is one reason early representation by a health care fraud defense attorney can be important.
Criminal tax enforcement is expressly incorporated into the Fraud Division's mission.
DOJ identifies conduct including false claims on tax returns, concealed income, falsified information, and promotion of allegedly illegal tax schemes.
The Department says it intends to combine traditional criminal tax enforcement with:
DOJ says these capabilities are intended to identify misconduct earlier and pursue suspected offenders more efficiently.
Can a fraud investigation also become a tax investigation?
Potentially.
The DOJ memorandum specifically recognizes that someone accused of stealing money from a government program or private victim may also be suspected of violating federal tax laws.
Consequently, a federal fraud investigation may expand beyond the transaction that originally attracted investigators' attention.
Bank accounts, business records, tax returns, financial transactions, and the movement of allegedly unlawful proceeds may all become relevant to the investigation.
DOJ has also designated global trade and commerce as a major fraud-enforcement priority.
The Fraud Division says it will lead coordinated criminal enforcement concerning trade and customs violations and supply chains allegedly associated with forced labor.
Specific targets identified in the memorandum include:
DOJ says prosecutors participating in the cross-agency Trade Fraud Task Force will focus on systemic, high-impact noncompliance affecting U.S. economic or national security.
Companies involved in importing, exporting, customs declarations, international payments, or global supply chains should therefore pay particular attention to this initiative.
Corporate misconduct is DOJ's fifth principal priority.
The memorandum says the Division already has a “strong pipeline of ongoing corporate matters” and intends to prioritize anti-fraud corporate enforcement.
At the same time, DOJ says it intends to recognize organizations that voluntarily self-disclose misconduct, cooperate with the government, and remediate problems.
Should a company voluntarily disclose suspected misconduct?
That is a decision that should generally be made only after careful legal analysis.
A company that discovers potential misconduct may have to consider numerous issues, including:
The DOJ memorandum makes clear that voluntary disclosure and cooperation can matter to the government's treatment of corporate conduct. But that does not mean disclosure is automatically the correct decision in every situation.
Experienced federal criminal counsel should evaluate the particular facts and applicable DOJ policies before a company makes a potentially consequential disclosure.
One of the most significant features of DOJ's new structure may be its National Fraud Detection Center.
The organizational chart accompanying the memorandum places the Detection Center alongside specialized components that include the:
The chart also identifies District Fraud Counsel as part of the Division's structure.
Taken together with the memorandum's repeated references to technology and data analysis, the structure suggests an enforcement model capable of identifying and developing potential cases across jurisdictions.
Modern federal investigations do not necessarily begin when a witness walks into an FBI office.
Government agencies possess enormous quantities of financial, billing, tax, contracting, health care, and other information.
DOJ's memorandum repeatedly emphasizes data analytics, financial forensics, technology, and interagency coordination.
These tools can help investigators identify patterns they consider suspicious.
But there is a crucial distinction between detecting an anomaly and proving a crime.
A computer can identify an unusual transaction or pattern. That does not, standing alone, establish why it occurred or whether someone acted with criminal intent.
The defense may therefore need to investigate the government's data as aggressively as the government investigates the defendant.
Federal investigations frequently begin before criminal charges become public.
Possible indications of a federal fraud investigation include:
None of these circumstances necessarily means criminal charges will be filed.
But they are reasons to consult a federal fraud defense attorney promptly.
If federal investigators contact you, what happens next can materially affect the case.
Do not destroy or alter evidence.
Preserve potentially relevant documents, emails, text messages, financial information, business records, and electronically stored information.
Do not assume an interview is “just a conversation.”
Statements to federal investigators can have serious consequences. You generally should understand your legal position and obtain appropriate legal advice before deciding whether to participate in an interview.
Do not attempt to coordinate accounts with other witnesses.
Communications that seem innocent at the time can later become part of the government's investigation.
Preserve evidence that may help the defense.
Exculpatory emails, contracts, accounting records, text messages, policies, expert information, and other evidence can disappear with time.
Contact experienced federal criminal defense counsel.
Early representation may allow counsel to communicate with investigators or prosecutors, determine the nature of the investigation, identify relevant evidence, investigate the government's allegations, and begin developing a defense before charging decisions are made.
Yes. A person does not have to wait until an indictment to retain a federal fraud defense attorney.
In many cases, the pre-indictment stage is one of the most consequential periods of the entire federal criminal process.
Depending upon the circumstances, defense counsel may be able to:
Not every federal investigation results in an indictment.
Early defense work can therefore be fundamentally different from defending a case after charges have already been filed.
No. An investigation is not a criminal conviction, and it does not necessarily result in charges.
Federal prosecutors must evaluate whether the evidence supports prosecution under the applicable law.
Fraud cases can involve complicated questions concerning knowledge, intent, materiality, business practices, accounting, reliance on professionals, contractual requirements, regulatory rules, and the meaning of particular statements or representations.
The government's characterization of a transaction is not necessarily the only reasonable interpretation of what occurred.
A defense investigation can be particularly important when government scrutiny originated from an algorithm, statistical anomaly, whistleblower allegation, cooperating witness, or incomplete financial information.
The scale of the government's initiative is significant.
DOJ's memorandum cites a Government Accountability Office estimate that the federal government loses approximately $233 billion to $521 billion annually to fraud.
The government's response includes hundreds of attorneys and staff, specialized enforcement sections, data scientists, financial analysis, asset recovery resources, investigative personnel, automated litigation support, and coordination with law enforcement and prosecutors around the country.
The message for individuals and businesses is straightforward:
Federal fraud enforcement is becoming increasingly centralized, technologically sophisticated, and data-driven.
That makes the period before charges are filed particularly important.
Kenney Legal Defense represents individuals facing serious federal criminal investigations and prosecutions.
Federal fraud cases may involve complex financial transactions, extensive electronic evidence, grand jury proceedings, multiple federal agencies, asset forfeiture issues, and potentially serious criminal penalties.
If you have received a federal grand jury subpoena, target letter, search warrant, or contact from federal investigators, or you have reason to believe that you or your business is under investigation, obtaining experienced federal criminal defense counsel early can be critical.
Contact Kenney Legal Defense to discuss your case confidentially with a federal criminal defense attorney.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
